Monday, November 28, 2005
Mark's Sysinternals Blog: Sony, Rootkits and Digital Rights Management Gone Too Far
Mark's Sysinternals Blog: Sony, Rootkits and Digital Rights Management Gone Too FarThose keys have security permissions that only allow the Local System account to modify them, so I relaunched Regedit in the Local System account using PsExec: psexec ?s ?i ?d regedit.exe
Friday, November 25, 2005
Wednesday, November 23, 2005
AnandTech: Inside Microsoft's Xbox 360
AnandTech: Inside Microsoft's Xbox 360: "The CPU itself features three of these PowerPC cores and is currently manufactured on a 90nm process, however Microsoft will most likely be transitioning to 65nm as soon as possible in order to reduce the die size and thus manufacturing costs. "
IBM Holds Servers
IBM Holds Servers: " revenue decline by 7.6%, and lost its third-place standing to Dell "
Tuesday, November 22, 2005
Mac Rumors: Intel forms 'Apple' Group
Mac Rumors: Intel forms 'Apple' Group: "that Intel Corp. has formed an internal 'Apple group'."
Intel Faces Increased Risk From Flash-Memory Venture - Forbes.com
Intel Faces Increased Risk From Flash-Memory Venture - Forbes.com: "We believe Micron gross margins for its NAND business were roughly 20% in its most recent quarter, well below Intel's gross margins of 61%.' "
Monday, November 21, 2005
Saturday, November 19, 2005
Read two biometrics, get worse results - how it works | The Register
Read two biometrics, get worse results - how it works | The Register: "Daugman produces the calculations governing the use of two hypothetical biometrics, one with both false accept and false reject rates of one in 100, and the second with the two rates at one in 1,000. On its own, biometric one would produce 2,000 errors in 100,000 tests, while biometric two would produce 200. You can treat the use of two biometrics in one of two ways - the subject must be required to pass both (the 'AND' rule) or the subject need only pass one (the 'OR' rule). Daugman finds that under either rule there would be 1,100 errors, i.e. 5.5 times more errors than if the stronger test were used alone.
He concludes that a stronger biometric is therefore better used alone than in combination, but only when both are operating at their crossover points. If the false accept rate (when using the 'OR' rule) or the false reject rate (when using the 'AND' rule) is brought down sufficiently (to 'smaller than twice the crossover error rate of the stronger test', says Daugman) then use of two can improve results. If we recklessly attempt to put a non-mathemetical gloss on that, we could think of the subject having to pass two tests (in the case of the 'AND') rule of, say, facial and iris. Dropping the false reject rate of the facial test (i.e. letting more people through) in line with Daugman's calculations would produce a better result than using iris alone, but if the facial system rejects fewer people wrongly, then it will presumably be accepting more people wrongly."
He concludes that a stronger biometric is therefore better used alone than in combination, but only when both are operating at their crossover points. If the false accept rate (when using the 'OR' rule) or the false reject rate (when using the 'AND' rule) is brought down sufficiently (to 'smaller than twice the crossover error rate of the stronger test', says Daugman) then use of two can improve results. If we recklessly attempt to put a non-mathemetical gloss on that, we could think of the subject having to pass two tests (in the case of the 'AND') rule of, say, facial and iris. Dropping the false reject rate of the facial test (i.e. letting more people through) in line with Daugman's calculations would produce a better result than using iris alone, but if the facial system rejects fewer people wrongly, then it will presumably be accepting more people wrongly."
Hyperthreading hurts server performance, say developers - ZDNet UK News
Hyperthreading hurts server performance, say developers - ZDNet UK News: "Hyperthreading hurts server performance"
Monday, November 14, 2005
My Way News
My Way News: "The UltraSparc T1 processor, code-named Niagara, has eight computing engines on a single chip, "
Tuesday, November 08, 2005
Intel Dempsey reviewed, challenges Opterons
Intel Dempsey reviewed, challenges Opterons: "Intel Dempsey reviewed, challenges Opterons "
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)